12 posts tagged with "comparison"

Modern robots collect a lot of data from sensors, cameras, logs, and system outputs. Managing this data well is important for debugging, performance tracking, and training machine learning models.

Over the past few years, we've been building a storage system from scratch. As part of that work, we spoke with many robotics teams across different industries to understand their challenges with data management.

Here's what we heard often:

• Only a subset of what robots generate is actually useful
• Network connections are not always stable or fast
• On-device storage is limited (hard drive swaps is not practical)
• Teams rely on manual workflows with scripts and raw files
• It's hard to find and extract the right data later
• ROS bag files get large quickly and are difficult to manage

In this article, we compare four tools built to handle robotics data: ReductStore, Foxglove, Rerun, and Heex. We look at how they work, what they're good at, and which use cases they support.

If you're working with robots and need to organize, stream, or store data more effectively, this overview should help.

As data-driven applications evolve, the need for efficient storage solutions continues to grow. ReductStore and MinIO are two powerful solutions designed to handle massive amounts of unstructured data, but they serve different purposes.

While ReductStore is optimized for time-series object storage with a focus on unstructured data such as sensor logs, images, and machine-generated data for robotics and IIoT, MinIO is a high-performance object storage system built for scalable, cloud-native applications with a focus on S3 compatibility and enterprise-wide storage needs.

In this article, we'll explore the differences between ReductStore and MinIO, examine where each excels, and discuss how they can be used together to build a more comprehensive data storage solution.

With the rapid growth of time-series data in AI, IoT, and industrial automation, choosing the right database solution can significantly impact performance, scalability, and efficiency. As we covered briefly in our whitepaper, ReductStore and TimescaleDB are two powerful but distinct solutions, each designed to handle time-series data in different ways. ReductStore specializes in unstructured time-series data, making it ideal for edge computing and large binary objects. TimescaleDB, on the other hand, is an extension of PostgreSQL, optimized for structured time-series data with robust querying capabilities. In this article, we'll explore these differences between ReductStore and TimescaleDB, as well as their other strengths, and when to use each.